The paper addresses and weighs the possibilities and usefulness of an intercultural approach to the associative phenomenon, particularly within the context of majority rule. It focuses on the cultural and religious matrices underlying majority rule as they are deduced from its historical and functional origin and from its legal experience. The Author aims to investigate the peculiarities of the contexts underlying the differing views on the principle and, at the same time, to highlight the common elements that could allow corresponding traditions to be reconciled within the framework of a unitary conceptual and regulatory framework. Finally, some applicative hypotheses are proposed with a view towards conciliation between differing cultural/religious approaches to rule and equality.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- The Digital Omnibus Dilemma. Some Ethical and Legal Considerations on the Postponement of Certain Provisions of the European Artificial Intelligence Act. 10/05/2026
- Libertà religiosa e ‘fine della cristianità’. Una genealogia parigina del Concilio Vaticano II (1927-1965). 23/04/2026
- Traduzione interlegale vs. traduzione giuridico-interculturale. La recezione in Italia delle successioni islamiche tra regole e situazioni normative. 08/04/2026
- La traduzione interculturale dell’invisibile/Al-Ghayb. Un ‘farmaco semiotico’ per le sincopi giuridico-comunicative tra individui di differente cultura. 24/03/2026
- The Ecological Imperative: From the Relationship of Domination to Coexistence. 21/03/2026