The following essay offers some legal-philosophical reflections about the current pandemic resulting from the spread of coronavirus Covid-19. These are concentrated around a few core-themes: (1) the role and of mass media and the problem of credibility; (2) the issue of cooperation among states (mostly within the EU); (3) the complex role of rules—and the relationship between normativity and moral agency – in a moment when individual freedoms are being limited in favor of other (health-related) priorities. Finally, the author offers some brief critical remarks on (4) the limits of utilitarian ethics with reference to the issue of ‘herd immunity’ as a possible strategy for assessing the Covid-19 pandemic. Such themes demonstrate how the current situation poses important questions for our contemporary societies involving anthropological, sociological, political and ethical issues. In this sense, this crisis is seen – as the semantic range of the Greek word ‘krisis’ suggests – not only with regard to its dramatic implications, but also as a chance for an overall rethinking of some underlying premises that characterize our post-modern societies, especially in Western countries.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- Il dibattito sull’oscurità legislativa a un anno dalla sent. 110/2023. Bilanci e prospettive. 11/07/2025
- Migranti e informazione adeguata 05/07/2025
- Immigrati, “apolidi” dei rapporti bancari. L’apertura di conto corrente alla prova dell’incoerenza linguistica della normativa 05/07/2025
- Diritto di lasciarsi morire dignitosamente e informazione adeguata. La tutela dello straniero nel fine vita. 02/07/2025
- Malintesa. Aforismi chiastici sulla (il-)legittimità costituzionale delle intese mancanti e sui possibili rimedi all’inerzia legislativa. 26/06/2025