The present contribution is part of a broader investigation that involves the jurist in a dynamic and constantly evolving training process. The aim is to focus attention on an increasingly ‘diastemic’ legal science (using François Jullien’s lexicon) characterised by continuous transformations that make it ‘escape’ from a purely ‘systemic’ logic of law linked to a very modern image of juridicality and turn towards an increasingly inclusive legal education. To this end, a comparison between past, present and future perspectives is necessary, moving from tradition to innovation to be understood as an applied methodology within a reflection on the way in which a science works with the ‘intellectual tools’ at its disposal.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- The Digital Omnibus Dilemma. Some Ethical and Legal Considerations on the Postponement of Certain Provisions of the European Artificial Intelligence Act. 10/05/2026
- Libertà religiosa e ‘fine della cristianità’. Una genealogia parigina del Concilio Vaticano II (1927-1965). 23/04/2026
- Traduzione interlegale vs. traduzione giuridico-interculturale. La recezione in Italia delle successioni islamiche tra regole e situazioni normative. 08/04/2026
- La traduzione interculturale dell’invisibile/Al-Ghayb. Un ‘farmaco semiotico’ per le sincopi giuridico-comunicative tra individui di differente cultura. 24/03/2026
- The Ecological Imperative: From the Relationship of Domination to Coexistence. 21/03/2026