The aim of this essay is to analyze the topic of filiation considering both canonical and Italian private law perspectives. The distinction of differing types and categories of filiation is traditionally regarded as the most efficacious hermeneutic way to enforce the role of marriage in regulating family relationships. This well-established model is beginning to open up to radically new possibilities emerging from medical-scientific and civil legal perspectives. The presumed secularization of the canonical matrimonial system has not eclipsed its central role in meeting the needs of children and managing spousal relationships, creating a situation in which traditional demands coexist with unforeseen conflicts and social scenarios not previously encountered.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- Alla ricerca della norma perduta. Itinerari per una lettura ontologica degli studi socio-antropologici di Hans Kelsen sui popoli primitivi. 31/10/2025
- Artificial Turn. Migrations and Asylum at the Encounter with Safe Countries of Origin in The Ontologies of Borders and the Epistemologies of Control. 26/10/2025
- Diritto e speranza. Una riflessione giusfilosofica su Habermas, Alexy e Dworkin. 19/10/2025
- “Fino a queer tutto bene”. Genere, sessualità e diritti in prospettiva multidisciplinare. 29/09/2025
- “A los occidentales solo les importa lo que ven”. Percorsi e pratiche di traduzione dell’invisibile fra lavoro, diritto e temporalità nella Córdoba “migrante”. 24/09/2025