The article proposes a different way of thinking about the relationship between social robotics and law, starting from Dumouchel’s theory of emotions and his analysis of human interactions. The original social and constructivist dimension of emotions is linked to affective neuroscience and to the theory of mirror neurons, to then arrive at Vico’s rhetorical and constructivist methodology, intended as a theoretical alternative to modern legal positivism. This critique is finally linked to Ricca’s intercultural chorological perspective and Sequeri’s affective turn, with the aim of reconfiguring the relationship between the visible and the invisible as a critique of modernity and its myths.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- L’importanza di chiamarsi Jihad. La società multiculturale alla prova del nome 20/01/2023
- Two wrongs don’t make one right – Memory, History and Rebalancing Actions: A Reading on ‘Cancel Culture’ through the Lens of a Restorative Approach 04/01/2023
- Il ritmo giuridico delle processioni religiose. Riflessioni critiche a margine di una recente e ancipite sentenza in materia di turbatio sacrorum (Cass. pen., III, 2242/2022) 22/12/2022
- Pluralismo giuridico e storicità del diritto. Per una implementazione dell’Indice Semantico del Lessico Giuridico Italiano 26/11/2022
- Eracle sulle rive dell’Oxus. L’ellenismo orientale e la sfida dell’interculturalità alle origini delle ‘Vie della Seta’. Un approccio filosofico-giuridico e sociologico-politico 25/11/2022