Modern contract law attempts to balance the informational and material asymmetries between contracting parties. In Western legal systems, these strategies aimed towards fairness have been effective in facilitating the circulation and the redistribution of assets. If we look at the issues brought forth by Islamic communities within non-Islamic constitutional systems, it is possible to claim that similar instances of contractual fairness and social justice have been prevalent in Arab-Islamic legal regimes as well. These processes of conceptual elaboration have had a tremendous influence on doctrinal interpretations, jurisdictional solutions and commonly observed praxes. The aim of this essay is to concretely demonstrate how the protection of these heterogeneous demands did not determine contract law paradigms that were incompatible with European civil disciplines, quite the opposite; within an intercultural process of cross-translation of semantic differences, Islamic financial transactions and their related legal types seem to imply analogous positions rather than divergent and persistent risks of abuses and inter partes conflicts.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- (Re-)immaginare il diritto. Riflessi giuridici nella visione filosofico-politica di Cornelius Castoriadis 09/11/2026
- Il giudizio etico oltre il protocollo: intelligenza artificiale, responsabilità e trasformazione biogiuridica dei Comitati etici nella ricerca sanitaria. (Una lettura del rapporto OMS 2026 tra filosofia del diritto e governo dell’innovazione) 23/10/2026
- Tradurre il dopo-morte. Fattore religioso, fenomeni parasuccessori e autonomia privata oltre il pluralismo euclideo 22/10/2026
- Il senso della fine: Eubiosia e traduzione interculturale tra accompagnamento, morte e commiato 10/10/2026
- Il caso “Paragon”. Rischi ed eterogenesi dei fini di un sistema informatico concepito per attività investigativa d’intelligence 21/09/2026