The concepts of blasphemy and sacrilege have traditionally been etymologically related to religious vocabulary. In the current language of secularized contemporary societies it would be preferable to term them as provocation, incitement to hatred, insult. The tangled relationship between disrespect and freedom of expression must therefore be renewed. The issues at stake cannot be considered as mere problem of contents but also include modalities of expression and practical limits. Therefore, the related analysis should start by pointing out the importance of both free expression of thought and artistic freedom through a critical examination of European case law. Moreover, it should aim to grasp an insightful understanding about democracy and its concepts so as to support an improving interpretation of freedom. So, it may be preferable to follow the guidelines already developed by racial and anti-discrimination studies and to assume “human dignity” rather than public policy as the main legal interest to be protected by the provision of the so called “hate crimes”.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- I matrimoni non-eterosessuali e i ‘registri’ della coscienza. Verità vs. dignità e libertà. 29/08/2025
- Non-heterosexual marriages and the ‘registers’ of conscience.Pitting truth and dignity against freedom. 29/08/2025
- Gli attanti metaversali come soggetti di diritto. Brevi riflessioni a partire da John R. Searle. 18/08/2025
- Il soprannaturale dei luoghi come orizzonte accomunante della ‘civiltà mediterranea’. Una prospettiva antropologico-filosofica e antropologico-giuridica a partire da Simone Weil. 14/08/2025
- La disobbedienza civile digitale nella Società algoritmica. 11/08/2025