The concepts of blasphemy and sacrilege have traditionally been etymologically related to religious vocabulary. In the current language of secularized contemporary societies it would be preferable to term them as provocation, incitement to hatred, insult. The tangled relationship between disrespect and freedom of expression must therefore be renewed. The issues at stake cannot be considered as mere problem of contents but also include modalities of expression and practical limits. Therefore, the related analysis should start by pointing out the importance of both free expression of thought and artistic freedom through a critical examination of European case law. Moreover, it should aim to grasp an insightful understanding about democracy and its concepts so as to support an improving interpretation of freedom. So, it may be preferable to follow the guidelines already developed by racial and anti-discrimination studies and to assume “human dignity” rather than public policy as the main legal interest to be protected by the provision of the so called “hate crimes”.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- Libertà di coscienza e giuramento nelle società plurireligiose europee. Approdi normativi, orientamenti giurisprudenziali e prospettive interculturali 28/03/2025
- Introduzione editoriale. La comunicazione giuridico-amministrativa interculturale. Un progetto di analisi e di riscrittura. 23/03/2025
- Anelli dell’invisibilità, anelli del potere. Alla ricerca di un equilibrio tra sorveglianza e democrazia a partire da Platone, Tolkien e Bentham. 24/02/2025
- Il Sabato, Babele e la traduzione 28/12/2024
- Abitare il sacro e diritto alla città. Percorsi di costruzione della soggettività giuridica: da clandestini a cittadini attraverso le chiese cristiano-ortodosse 22/12/2024