The concepts of blasphemy and sacrilege have traditionally been etymologically related to religious vocabulary. In the current language of secularized contemporary societies it would be preferable to term them as provocation, incitement to hatred, insult. The tangled relationship between disrespect and freedom of expression must therefore be renewed. The issues at stake cannot be considered as mere problem of contents but also include modalities of expression and practical limits. Therefore, the related analysis should start by pointing out the importance of both free expression of thought and artistic freedom through a critical examination of European case law. Moreover, it should aim to grasp an insightful understanding about democracy and its concepts so as to support an improving interpretation of freedom. So, it may be preferable to follow the guidelines already developed by racial and anti-discrimination studies and to assume “human dignity” rather than public policy as the main legal interest to be protected by the provision of the so called “hate crimes”.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- Il giudizio etico oltre il protocollo: intelligenza artificiale, responsabilità e trasformazione biogiuridica dei Comitati etici nella ricerca sanitaria. (Una lettura del rapporto OMS 2026 tra filosofia del diritto e governo dell’innovazione) 23/10/2026
- Tradurre il dopo-morte. Fattore religioso, fenomeni parasuccessori e autonomia privata oltre il pluralismo euclideo 22/10/2026
- Il senso della fine: Eubiosia e traduzione interculturale tra accompagnamento, morte e commiato 10/10/2026
- Il caso “Paragon”. Rischi ed eterogenesi dei fini di un sistema informatico concepito per attività investigativa d’intelligence 21/09/2026
- Discriminazioni di genere: il ruolo delle istituzioni 22/08/2026