In the economic field, the law is often perceived solely for the service function it provides (or should provide) to the benefit of market players. The economy thus drives the creation of negotiating instruments at the service of the great private economic powers. As a result, the weaker “parties” accept negotiating constraints which, although apparently voluntarily assumed in their conclusions and effects, actually limit their freedom by creating a functional and economic dependency.
Is there a way to break this link and intervene in defense of values such as equality and solidarity which should be integral to contemporary societies?
Among the various possibilities for positive conduct, religions are placed in the front row, above all for their nomopoietic function. Religious values and rights contribute to making the processes of “law systems self-analysis” more just, by curbing the interpretations of the law that benefit the economically dominant social classes.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- Alla ricerca della norma perduta. Itinerari per una lettura ontologica degli studi socio-antropologici di Hans Kelsen sui popoli primitivi. 31/10/2025
- Artificial Turn. Migrations and Asylum at the Encounter with Safe Countries of Origin in The Ontologies of Borders and the Epistemologies of Control. 26/10/2025
- Diritto e speranza. Una riflessione giusfilosofica su Habermas, Alexy e Dworkin. 19/10/2025
- “Fino a queer tutto bene”. Genere, sessualità e diritti in prospettiva multidisciplinare. 29/09/2025
- “A los occidentales solo les importa lo que ven”. Percorsi e pratiche di traduzione dell’invisibile fra lavoro, diritto e temporalità nella Córdoba “migrante”. 24/09/2025