In the economic field, the law is often perceived solely for the service function it provides (or should provide) to the benefit of market players. The economy thus drives the creation of negotiating instruments at the service of the great private economic powers. As a result, the weaker “parties” accept negotiating constraints which, although apparently voluntarily assumed in their conclusions and effects, actually limit their freedom by creating a functional and economic dependency.
Is there a way to break this link and intervene in defense of values such as equality and solidarity which should be integral to contemporary societies?
Among the various possibilities for positive conduct, religions are placed in the front row, above all for their nomopoietic function. Religious values and rights contribute to making the processes of “law systems self-analysis” more just, by curbing the interpretations of the law that benefit the economically dominant social classes.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- Il giudizio etico oltre il protocollo: intelligenza artificiale, responsabilità e trasformazione biogiuridica dei Comitati etici nella ricerca sanitaria. (Una lettura del rapporto OMS 2026 tra filosofia del diritto e governo dell’innovazione) 23/10/2026
- Tradurre il dopo-morte. Fattore religioso, fenomeni parasuccessori e autonomia privata oltre il pluralismo euclideo 22/10/2026
- Il senso della fine: Eubiosia e traduzione interculturale tra accompagnamento, morte e commiato 10/10/2026
- Il caso “Paragon”. Rischi ed eterogenesi dei fini di un sistema informatico concepito per attività investigativa d’intelligence 21/09/2026
- Discriminazioni di genere: il ruolo delle istituzioni 22/08/2026