In the economic field, the law is often perceived solely for the service function it provides (or should provide) to the benefit of market players. The economy thus drives the creation of negotiating instruments at the service of the great private economic powers. As a result, the weaker “parties” accept negotiating constraints which, although apparently voluntarily assumed in their conclusions and effects, actually limit their freedom by creating a functional and economic dependency.
Is there a way to break this link and intervene in defense of values such as equality and solidarity which should be integral to contemporary societies?
Among the various possibilities for positive conduct, religions are placed in the front row, above all for their nomopoietic function. Religious values and rights contribute to making the processes of “law systems self-analysis” more just, by curbing the interpretations of the law that benefit the economically dominant social classes.
- L’importanza di chiamarsi Jihad. La società multiculturale alla prova del nome 20/01/2023
- Two wrongs don’t make one right – Memory, History and Rebalancing Actions: A Reading on ‘Cancel Culture’ through the Lens of a Restorative Approach 04/01/2023
- Il ritmo giuridico delle processioni religiose. Riflessioni critiche a margine di una recente e ancipite sentenza in materia di turbatio sacrorum (Cass. pen., III, 2242/2022) 22/12/2022
- Pluralismo giuridico e storicità del diritto. Per una implementazione dell’Indice Semantico del Lessico Giuridico Italiano 26/11/2022
- Eracle sulle rive dell’Oxus. L’ellenismo orientale e la sfida dell’interculturalità alle origini delle ‘Vie della Seta’. Un approccio filosofico-giuridico e sociologico-politico 25/11/2022