The hypertrophic growth of legal litigation has slowed Italian justice, increasing the risk of ineffectiveness of the law. This phenomenon has been opposed, in counter-reaction, by a cultural change which has resulted in the implementation of several conciliatory remedies, particularly in civil litigation law. The importance of these remedies, however, is not limited only to civil law systems, but also extends to religious systems. In Judaism, for example, the typical schemes of conciliatory private autonomy, better known by the acronym ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution), are considered by Talmudic sources to be preferred tools in the resolution of inter-private conflicts. These observations lead us to reconsider ADR in the prism of intercultural law, paying special attention to those who work in the legal field. Lawyers in particular are called upon to develop new competencies, transforming their role as defenders of rights into the entirely new role of ‘Intercultural Case Managers.’
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- L’importanza di chiamarsi Jihad. La società multiculturale alla prova del nome 20/01/2023
- Two wrongs don’t make one right – Memory, History and Rebalancing Actions: A Reading on ‘Cancel Culture’ through the Lens of a Restorative Approach 04/01/2023
- Il ritmo giuridico delle processioni religiose. Riflessioni critiche a margine di una recente e ancipite sentenza in materia di turbatio sacrorum (Cass. pen., III, 2242/2022) 22/12/2022
- Pluralismo giuridico e storicità del diritto. Per una implementazione dell’Indice Semantico del Lessico Giuridico Italiano 26/11/2022
- Eracle sulle rive dell’Oxus. L’ellenismo orientale e la sfida dell’interculturalità alle origini delle ‘Vie della Seta’. Un approccio filosofico-giuridico e sociologico-politico 25/11/2022