The hypertrophic growth of legal litigation has slowed Italian justice, increasing the risk of ineffectiveness of the law. This phenomenon has been opposed, in counter-reaction, by a cultural change which has resulted in the implementation of several conciliatory remedies, particularly in civil litigation law. The importance of these remedies, however, is not limited only to civil law systems, but also extends to religious systems. In Judaism, for example, the typical schemes of conciliatory private autonomy, better known by the acronym ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution), are considered by Talmudic sources to be preferred tools in the resolution of inter-private conflicts. These observations lead us to reconsider ADR in the prism of intercultural law, paying special attention to those who work in the legal field. Lawyers in particular are called upon to develop new competencies, transforming their role as defenders of rights into the entirely new role of ‘Intercultural Case Managers.’
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- Libertà religiosa ai ‘fischietti’. Il ruolo dell’arbitro nel contrasto tra regolamenti sportivi e precetti religiosi 01/03/2024
- L’eterno ritorno dell’uguale? La poligamia nello spazio giuridico contemporaneo. Tra identità religiosa e (nuove) istanze di legittimazione 15/01/2024
- Itinerari teorici in Maurice Hauriou tra istituzione, transazione e circolarità ermeneutica 26/12/2023
- “No Taxation Without Representation”? The enfranchisement of migrants in Europe as a matter of intercultural government 18/12/2023
- Interculturalism: understanding the concept from a comparative perspective 16/12/2023