The present contribution is part of a broader investigation that involves the jurist in a dynamic and constantly evolving training process. The aim is to focus attention on an increasingly ‘diastemic’ legal science (using François Jullien’s lexicon) characterised by continuous transformations that make it ‘escape’ from a purely ‘systemic’ logic of law linked to a very modern image of juridicality and turn towards an increasingly inclusive legal education. To this end, a comparison between past, present and future perspectives is necessary, moving from tradition to innovation to be understood as an applied methodology within a reflection on the way in which a science works with the ‘intellectual tools’ at its disposal.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- Il dibattito sull’oscurità legislativa a un anno dalla sent. 110/2023. Bilanci e prospettive. 11/07/2025
- Migranti e informazione adeguata 05/07/2025
- Immigrati, “apolidi” dei rapporti bancari. L’apertura di conto corrente alla prova dell’incoerenza linguistica della normativa 05/07/2025
- Diritto di lasciarsi morire dignitosamente e informazione adeguata. La tutela dello straniero nel fine vita. 02/07/2025
- Malintesa. Aforismi chiastici sulla (il-)legittimità costituzionale delle intese mancanti e sui possibili rimedi all’inerzia legislativa. 26/06/2025