The present contribution is part of a broader investigation that involves the jurist in a dynamic and constantly evolving training process. The aim is to focus attention on an increasingly ‘diastemic’ legal science (using François Jullien’s lexicon) characterised by continuous transformations that make it ‘escape’ from a purely ‘systemic’ logic of law linked to a very modern image of juridicality and turn towards an increasingly inclusive legal education. To this end, a comparison between past, present and future perspectives is necessary, moving from tradition to innovation to be understood as an applied methodology within a reflection on the way in which a science works with the ‘intellectual tools’ at its disposal.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- I matrimoni non-eterosessuali e i ‘registri’ della coscienza. Verità vs. dignità e libertà. 29/08/2025
- Non-heterosexual marriages and the ‘registers’ of conscience.Pitting truth and dignity against freedom. 29/08/2025
- Gli attanti metaversali come soggetti di diritto. Brevi riflessioni a partire da John R. Searle. 18/08/2025
- Il soprannaturale dei luoghi come orizzonte accomunante della ‘civiltà mediterranea’. Una prospettiva antropologico-filosofica e antropologico-giuridica a partire da Simone Weil. 14/08/2025
- La disobbedienza civile digitale nella Società algoritmica. 11/08/2025