The present contribution is part of a broader investigation that involves the jurist in a dynamic and constantly evolving training process. The aim is to focus attention on an increasingly ‘diastemic’ legal science (using François Jullien’s lexicon) characterised by continuous transformations that make it ‘escape’ from a purely ‘systemic’ logic of law linked to a very modern image of juridicality and turn towards an increasingly inclusive legal education. To this end, a comparison between past, present and future perspectives is necessary, moving from tradition to innovation to be understood as an applied methodology within a reflection on the way in which a science works with the ‘intellectual tools’ at its disposal.
Topics
Observer
-
Latest Posts
- Verso “la tirannia della maggioranza”? La crisi dei diritti riproduttivi tra sentenze e ideologie 04/08/2025
- Il digitale come cura. Il contributo del fattore religioso nelle guarigioni ‘a distanza’. 04/08/2025
- On the Threshold: Some considerations on the relationship between present and future in the perspective of sustainability. 26/07/2025
- Il dibattito sull’oscurità legislativa a un anno dalla sent. 110/2023. Bilanci e prospettive. 11/07/2025
- Migranti e informazione adeguata 05/07/2025